WITCH :: essays research papers

In the winter of 1692, a wave of witch hysteria surrounded the settlement of Salem resolution in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The accusations began with two little girls who were acting strangely. There are many underlying factors to why these thoughts of witchcraft started coming about. These issues were going on before that winter of 1692. The winter of 1692 was the onset of the hysterics behind the witchcraft trials.To understand the reasons behind the hysteria, you have to know a little about the people who colonised the area of Salem Village. Mainly Puritans inhabited Salem Village. There were very few other religions at that time. The Puritans left England to escape religious persecution. Puritans wanted to sanctify the national church by eliminated what they saw as Catholic influence. They believed in the total sovereignty of God and the absolute sinfulness of man. They wanted to establish a union of church and state. Puritans believed they were entering into a sacred co mpact with God in the founding of the Massachusetts colony. They agreed to live according to his will in return for a divine endorsement in the New World. The people of Salem Village believed in witches. The word witchcraft meant the art of bewitching, casting spells, or manipulating the forces of nature. It was the idea of the people that this was impossible without the cooperation of the Devil. Many perceived that the Devil resented their way of life. The Devil had to act through a witch to do somatogenetic harm to human beings. He couldnt do it on his own. People who wholly believed in witches were always on the lookout for them. As a result, many people were wrongly accused.Puritans viewed the world in basic black and white. Discipline and devotion were slogans in the service of the Lord. The simplest acts of innocence were looked upon as questionable conduct or blush abnormal. Sinners were severely punished in Salem Village. The punishments were meant to humiliate the person as well as hurt. There was never respect for the privacy of any idiosyncratic in the seventeenth century. The community as a whole was expected to uphold the Puritan religion. They were encouraged to watch their neighbors closely and report any expression that drifted even slightly from the straight and narrow. According to some sources there was a problem with womens increasing independence. They lived in a society where men exercised literal authority over a woman.

Essay --

The leader of the new political party named The Blue Party organise an open air rally is Sydney. He fight canful to provide cater facilities for $5000 and request NSW police authority to provide additional protection for $3000. On the other hand, Hanson who is a committed acquaintance of capital of Minnesota agrees to fly sheet an aircraft over the rally for justify of charge and after the rally capital of Minnesota agrees to reimburse him with the full payment. Ian, who is a prominent sympathiser of Pauls political program, writes Paul saying that he will provide $10000. However at the end of the rally he refuses to pay Paul ascribable to the dramatic defy of his profitability of the worry.(A)Paul and JohnThe defendant Paul entered into a contract with the plaintiff John who is a catering renovation provider for the rally. The plaintiff was to provide catering facilities to the rally. The price was $5000. Paul is determined that the rally should be successful and, at the last minute, he agrees to pay John a pension of $1,000 to ensure that things mesh smoothly. At the end the defendant Paul failed to pay the extra money.Issue The issue is whether the plaintiffs (John) performance of its existing contractual duty to shade the catering service could amount to sufficient consideration for the promise of the additional payment. In Australia, the doctrine has developed beyond the restriction following the High philanders decision. jibe to the case law of Walton Stores the following pre-conditions for promissory estoppel i.Defendant (Paul) must make a promise of some kind.ii.Defendant (Paul) must besides create of upgrade an assumption on Plaintiffs (John) part that promise will be performed.iii.Plaintiff (John) must rely upon this to its detriment andiv.... ...rt held that Thomas promises or warranties were not supported by consideration, since their contract had been concluded when the promises were made, and hence there was no consideration. S imilarly, we can say that Pauls promises to Hanson were not supported by consideration, since their contract had been concluded as soon as the rally ended. On the other side, Hanson was already bounded to Hanson to perform an existing contractual obligation of flying an aircraft on during the rally for free of charge. Therefore, Paul should not enforce to reimburse Hanson because there was no consideration given by the plaintiff for the promise to pay. (D) Paul v IanTo succeed Pauls political program, Ian who is a prominent sympathizer, promise to gift $10000 in writing. Due to sudden decline in business Ian was unable to donate the fund after the successful rally. Essay -- The leader of the new political party named The Blue Party organise an open air rally is Sydney. He contract John to provide catering facilities for $5000 and request NSW police authority to provide additional protection for $3000. On the other hand, Hanson who is a committed supporter of Paul agrees to fly an aircraft over the rally for free of charge and after the rally Paul agrees to reimburse him with the full payment. Ian, who is a prominent sympathiser of Pauls political program, writes Paul saying that he will provide $10000. However at the end of the rally he refuses to pay Paul due to the dramatic decline of his profitability of the business.(A)Paul and JohnThe defendant Paul entered into a contract with the plaintiff John who is a catering service provider for the rally. The plaintiff was to provide catering facilities to the rally. The price was $5000. Paul is determined that the rally should be successful and, at the last minute, he agrees to pay John a bonus of $1,000 to ensure that things run smoothly. At the end the defendant Paul failed to pay the extra money.Issue The issue is whether the plaintiffs (John) performance of its existing contractual duty to complete the catering service could amount to sufficient consideration for the promise of the addition al payment. In Australia, the doctrine has developed beyond the restriction following the High Courts decision. According to the case law of Walton Stores the following pre-conditions for promissory estoppel i.Defendant (Paul) must make a promise of some kind.ii.Defendant (Paul) must also create of encourage an assumption on Plaintiffs (John) part that promise will be performed.iii.Plaintiff (John) must rely upon this to its detriment andiv.... ...rt held that Thomas promises or warranties were not supported by consideration, since their contract had been concluded when the promises were made, and hence there was no consideration. Similarly, we can say that Pauls promises to Hanson were not supported by consideration, since their contract had been concluded as soon as the rally ended. On the other side, Hanson was already bounded to Hanson to perform an existing contractual obligation of flying an aircraft on during the rally for free of charge. Therefore, Paul should not enforce to reimburse Hanson because there was no consideration given by the plaintiff for the promise to pay. (D) Paul v IanTo succeed Pauls political program, Ian who is a prominent sympathizer, promise to donate $10000 in writing. Due to sudden decline in business Ian was unable to donate the fund after the successful rally.

A Case Study of the International Finance Corporation in Nigeria :: Economics Business Case Study Essays

IFC Mission-To promote sustainable private sector investment in developingcountries.The homo Banks role, in my opinion, is to help improve the businessenvironment in the developing countries so that the private sector candrive growth.- Mr. peter Woicke, Executive Vice President of theWorld Bank Group (WBG) in charge of the International FinanceCorporation (IFC) - Lagos, August 2004.At the time Mr. Woicke was speaking, IFC troth in Nigeria hadreached $200million in investment commitments, a figure quicklysurpassed in less than a year from that date (as at June 2005, IFCinvestment in Nigeria was to the tune of $290million). This was inspite of the fact that only five short years before (in 1999), IFC wasdoing practically no business in Nigeria and merely had a usableworking office in Lagos. Mr. Woicke went on to say- We have increasedour exposure since democracy returned from almost nothing to almost$800 million and an exposure at the IFC of more or less $200 million. We havemade a bigger bet to have the bank (WB) and the IFC work on Nigeriasproblems together. We were quite instrumental in advising the government on ameliorates in the telecom sector. We have been pushing veryhard for privatization of other sectors.Clearly, the advent of democracy had re-ignited interest in Nigeria.The initiation of a reform agenda by the new government was alsoplaying a part in this renewed interest in Nigeria. Beyond financialcommitments however, IFC was fount to offer a great deal of otherservices towards developing the economic environment of business inNigeria. As Mr. Woicke put it- I really think we should increaseour presence quite (in Nigeria) dramatically. We dont necessarilywant to lend tons of money to Nigeria, because Nigeria has lots ofresources. We can contribute in terms of providing advice,transferring technology, providing technical know-how in social,environmental and corporate governance issuesIndeed, the nature of IFC operations globally and increasing ly inNigeria were such that contribution was becoming great in terms oftechnology, advice, social development, environmental assistance,corporate governance and ethical issues, and global competitivenessconcerns. IFC had begun to realize that their market, and indeed theirbusiness model had reached a crucial moment wherein clients had begunto expect more than just project finance deals and long termsyndications.Governments were asking for help on private sector issues that wentfar beyond privatization or concession structuring. There had arisen acase for IFC involvement as much in the Economic as in the Social,Environmental, Technological, Global and indeed mayhap ultimately-Political Environment of Business.II. IFC- HISTORY AND EVOLUTIONThe International Finance Corporation (IFC) was founded in 1956 to

John Brown: Violent Abolitionist :: essays research papers fc

John brownness was born on whitethorn 9, 1800 in Torrington, Connecticut. When he was about five years old, his father moved the family to Hudson, Ohio. There, John was modify with the heavy anti-slavery sentiment that was present in that area. This, combined with person-to-person observations of the maltreatment of blacks and the influence of Calvinism, started John dark-brown on his crusade to abolish slavery. In 1855, brownness and some(prenominal) of his sons moved to Kansas, a territory deeply shared out over the slavery issue. dark-brown was captured after the raid, sentenced to death, and was hung on December 2, 1859 in a case near town.On October 16, 1859, abolitionist John Brown and several(prenominal) followers seized the United States Armory and Arsenal at Harpers ferryboat. The actions of Browns men brought national attention to the aflame divisions relating to slaveryOn Pottawotamie Creek, on the night of May 24, 1856, Brown and his sons murdered three men who supported slavery, although none actu every(prenominal)y owned slaves. Brown and his sons escaped. Brown spent the next three years collecting notes from wealthy abolitionists in order to establish a colony for runaway slaves. To accomplish this, Brown needed weapons and so decided to capture the arsenal at Harpers Ferry. In 1794, President George Washington had selected Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and Springfield, Massachusetts, as the sites of the new national armories. In choosing Harpers Ferry, he famous the benefit of great waterpower provided by both the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers. Producing of weapons began in 1796. In 1817, the federal government contracted with John H. Hall to manufacture his patented rifles at Harpers Ferry. The arsenal and arsenal continued producing weapons until its destruction at the outbreak of the cultivated War. In the summer of 1859, John Brown, using the alias Isaac Smith, took up residence near Harpers Ferry on a farm in Maryland. He accomp lished a group of twenty-two men, including his sons Oliver, Owen, and Watson, in military training. On the night of Sunday, October 16, Brown and all but three of the men marched into Harpers Ferry, capturing several watchmen. The first dupe of the raid was an African-American railroad baggage handler named Hayward Shepherd, who was shot and killed after confronting the raiders. During the night, Brown captured several other prisoners, including Lewis Washington, the great-grand-nephew of George Washington. There were two keys to the success of the raid.John Brown Violent Abolitionist essays research papers fc John Brown was born on May 9, 1800 in Torrington, Connecticut. When he was about five years old, his father moved the family to Hudson, Ohio. There, John was filled with the heavy anti-slavery sentiment that was present in that area. This, combined with personal observations of the maltreatment of blacks and the influence of Calvinism, started John Brown on his crusade to abolish slavery. In 1855, Brown and several of his sons moved to Kansas, a territory deeply divided over the slavery issue. Brown was captured after the raid, sentenced to death, and was hung on December 2, 1859 in a field near town.On October 16, 1859, abolitionist John Brown and several followers seized the United States Armory and Arsenal at Harpers Ferry. The actions of Browns men brought national attention to the emotional divisions relating to slaveryOn Pottawotamie Creek, on the night of May 24, 1856, Brown and his sons murdered three men who supported slavery, although none actually owned slaves. Brown and his sons escaped. Brown spent the next three years collecting money from wealthy abolitionists in order to establish a colony for runaway slaves. To accomplish this, Brown needed weapons and so decided to capture the arsenal at Harpers Ferry. In 1794, President George Washington had selected Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and Springfield, Massachusetts, as the sites of the new national armories. In choosing Harpers Ferry, he noted the benefit of great waterpower provided by both the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers. Producing of weapons began in 1796. In 1817, the federal government contracted with John H. Hall to manufacture his patented rifles at Harpers Ferry. The armory and arsenal continued producing weapons until its destruction at the outbreak of the Civil War. In the summer of 1859, John Brown, using the alias Isaac Smith, took up residence near Harpers Ferry on a farm in Maryland. He trained a group of twenty-two men, including his sons Oliver, Owen, and Watson, in military training. On the night of Sunday, October 16, Brown and all but three of the men marched into Harpers Ferry, capturing several watchmen. The first victim of the raid was an African-American railroad baggage handler named Hayward Shepherd, who was shot and killed after confronting the raiders. During the night, Brown captured several other prisoners, including Lewis Washington, th e great-grand-nephew of George Washington. There were two keys to the success of the raid.

In my opinion, this was the first interesting part of the story. It :: Free Essay Writer

In my opinion, this was the first interest part of the story. It encouraged me to read on. This was the first soul vs. person conflict in the story. The conflict was between Burris and Miss Caroline. Also, this passage contained foreshadowing.To Kill a Mocking BirdMiss Caroline verbalise, Sit ingest please, Burris, and the moment she saidit I knew she had made a serious mistake. The boys condescensionflashed to anger. You try and make me, missus (pg 27). In myopinion, this was the first interesting part of the story. Itencouraged me to read on. This was the first person vs. personconflict in the story. The conflict was between Burris and MissCaroline. Also, this passage contained foreshadowing. When Jean Louisthought, and the moment she said it I knew she had made a seriousmistake, she was foreshadowing the tantrum that Burris would go on.According to Miss Stephanie, Boo was sitting in the living way of lifecutting some items from The Maycomb Tribune to paste in his scrapbook.His father entered the room. As Mr. Radley passed by, Boo drove thescissors into his parents leg, pulled them out, wiped them on hispants, and resumed his activities (pg 11). This was terribly shocking.It revealed Arthurs (Boo Radleys) voice immediately. It seemedthat he became ruthless, violent, and heartless when he joined thegang. I think he was turning evil. All of his love for everything wasslowly turning into hatred.The old house was the same, drooping and sick, but as we stared down thestreet we thought we saw an inside shutter move. Flick. A tiny, almostinvisible movement and the house was very exempt (pg 15). I can see theplot structure developing from this passage. It really kept me insuspense. In my opinion, this passage implies that Boo Radley saw thethree boys carry through their little stunt. Usually, no one would beconcerned if some one were to touch his or her house. However, BooRadley was a very violent person and had been locked up in his housefor years. Therefore, I think the three boys will have a conflict withBoo Radley eventually.Im goin after them em, he said. I sat upright. You cant. Iwont let you. (pg 56). This passage reveals the characters of both

In my opinion, this was the first interesting part of the story. It :: Free Essay Writer

In my opinion, this was the first interesting part of the story. It encouraged me to pronounce on. This was the first person vs. person conflict in the story. The conflict was between Burris and Miss Carolean. Also, this passage contained foreshadowing.To Kill a Mocking BirdMiss Caroline said, Sit down please, Burris, and the moment she saidit I knew she had made a serious mistake. The boys condescensionflashed to anger. You try and make me, missus (pg 27). In myopinion, this was the first interesting part of the story. Itencouraged me to read on. This was the first person vs. personconflict in the story. The conflict was between Burris and MissCaroline. Also, this passage contained foreshadowing. When blue jean Louisthought, and the moment she said it I knew she had made a seriousmistake, she was foreshadowing the tantrum that Burris would go on.According to Miss Stephanie, Boo was sitting in the living roomcutting some items from The Maycomb Tribune to paste in his scrapbook.His father entered the room. As Mr. Radley passed by, Boo drove thescissors into his parents leg, pulled them out, wiped them on hispants, and resumed his activities (pg 11). This was repulsively shocking.It revealed Arthurs (Boo Radleys) character immediately. It seemedthat he became ruthless, rampageous, and heartless when he joined thegang. I think he was turning evil. All of his love for everything wasslowly turning into hatred.The quondam(a) mark was the same, droopy and sick, but as we stared down thestreet we thought we truism an inside shutter move. Flick. A tiny, almostinvisible movement and the house was very still (pg 15). I can see theplot structure developing from this passage. It really kept me insuspense. In my opinion, this passage implies that Boo Radley saw thethree boys execute their little stunt. Usually, no one would beconcerned if some one were to touch his or her house. However, BooRadley was a very violent person and had been locked up in his housefor years . Therefore, I think the three boys will have a conflict withBoo Radley eventually.Im goin after(prenominal) them em, he said. I sat upright. You cant. Iwont let you. (pg 56). This passage reveals the characters of both